UDAŁO SIĘ!!.
Excellent, and well done to perinoid for spotting what I had missed regarding the beloved Rapidus. :)
Nie jesteś zalogowany. Proszę się zalogować lub zarejestrować.
Atari System Emulator v1.12 Wydano Atari System Emulator w wersji 1.12 z obsługą napędu B, nowymi trybami wyświetlania i usprawnieniami.
Altirra 4.50 test 20 Phaeron udostępnił kolejną kompilację testową emulatora Altirra z numerem 20.
Miracle Boy in Dragon Land bezpłatnie! Platformówka na Atari ST/STE została udostępniona całkowicie bezpłatnie dla wszystkich graczy.
Nowa wersja przeglądarki HighWire HighWire 0.5.0 Beta przynosi obsługę HTTPS, nowoczesnego CSS oraz kart pod TOS, FreeMiNT i MagiC.
CAS2Audio 1.0.5 Nowa wersja aplikacji CAS2Audio dla systemu Android przynosi całkowicie odświeżony i nowoczesny interfejs użytkownika.
atari.area forum » Posty przez flashjazzcat
UDAŁO SIĘ!!.
Excellent, and well done to perinoid for spotting what I had missed regarding the beloved Rapidus. :)
And how to install FJC SIDE2 U1MB firmware?
Eh? If you're updating from Candle's stock firmware, do so using the second set of instruction in my prior post. You might want to flash the whole ROM with ULTIMATE.ROM, thus updating SDX, OS ROMs, and firmware in one operation.
Right, I've just done the upgrade using AVG. With FJC SIDE2 U1MB firmware installed on the U1MB:
1. Make sure the PBI HDD and SDX are enabled in U1MB settings
2. Put the U1MB FIRMWARE.ATR disk image on the SD card
3. Power on the machine with AVG/SD card inserted and right AVG button held down
4. Go back to the U1MB setup menu with HELP+RESET, and press 'L' to start the SIDE loader
5. Find the FIRMWARE.ATR file, press TAB and set it as D1: without restarting the system
6. Go to the U1MB setup menu with HELP+RESET and press 'C' to reboot the system
7. Once SDX has booted, type UFLASH.XEX and upgrade the firmware
With Candle firmware (not tested, but sure to work since the above steps work):
1. Make sure 'SIDE Hardware' and SDX are enabled in U1MB settings
2. Put the U1MB FIRMWARE.ATR disk image on the SD card
3. Power on the machine with AVG/SD card inserted and right AVG button held down
4. Go back to the U1MB setup menu with HELP+RESET, and press 'L' to start the SIDE loader
5. Find the FIRMWARE.ATR file, press SPACE to tag the image as D1:
6. Go to the U1MB setup menu with HELP+RESET and press 'C' to reboot the system
7. Once SDX has booted, type UFLASH.XEX and upgrade the firmware
Basically, both methods are identical to the procedure already described in the firmware installation guide with the exception of putting AVG into SIDE emulation mode by holding the button down during power-up.
And having read you wished death to someone, it says 1000x more than is needed.
To complement what Albert already posted, here's the email Sal forwarded me in December last year when he was gravely ill:
One hardly knows where to begin here, but - aside from the peak schadenfreude on display - the idea that Sal had to point out the 'music gaps' and/or that they were only made manifest by YouTube encoding or specialised analytical equipment is laughable. I remember the remarks concerning chaotic scene transitions and - latterly - glitching music; commentators became frustrated not by flaws in pre-release software, but because the author appeared totally unaware of said flaws, and - when pressed on the matter - was absolutely unwilling to acknowledge their existence, resorting to such ridiculous extremes as accusing viewers of playing the YT video back at half-speed in an attempt to magnify problems that were already impossible to overlook anyway.
The normal transaction is that one offers one's work for appraisal (and I assume anyone publicising a YouTube video of their game wants it to be appraised), receives constructive criticism, separates bugs from feature requests and subjective value judgements, acknowledges any issues, and fixes the problems. But if the author is capable of bearing a grudge regarding comments on 'gaps in the music' (something which would have long ago been forgotten by all observers had Peter himself not taken every available opportunity to remind them) for three or four years, such that he is determined to this day to 'throw it back in their faces' by way of vengeance, I have to wonder why they participate in online activities of any kind, given how badly they react to bug reports and constructive criticism.
Instead of blaming a specious AtariAge conspiracy for the negative feedback received regarding game presentation, bugs, cartridge labels, etc, it might be better to blame the game presentation, bugs, and cartridge labels, as well as the flagrant shilling employed to misrepresent the public reaction to demos and products. I don't think Peter is personally sympathetic to the kind of victim-status endlessly peddled in today's society by those incapable of being criticised, and yet he seeks to 'play the victim' in exactly the same way. Speaking for myself, it's not that I have any particular desire to endlessly regurgitate a synopsis of events which happened three years ago, and it would have faded from memory by now had Peter not persisted in sending me DMs, emails and friend requests using sock-puppet Facebook and email accounts to get around the fact I had blocked his main account and - latterly - each sock-puppet account from which I received unsolicited messages. Well, let's call it what it is: spam. Normally spam is impersonal and goes in the junk mail folder, but since I knew (and have known for three years) damn well who was originating all this stuff, I'm afraid it has to be dealt with at source.
Opcja pierwsza (AVG, z klawiszem C) nie poskutkowała.
Sorry - I'm confused. I thought you were trying to reboot the system from the U1MB setup menu.
139 Device NAK
Depends what happened between running UFLASH and seeing a NAK error. :)
So how to achieve this?
I forget, since I rarely use AVG, but it will be described here:
I tu poległem bo moje FW nie pozwala na reset za pomocą "R".
Probably because it's 'C'. ;)
I think I got that far, but then UFLASH was unable to recognise the hardware. Using AVG in SIDE emulation mode at least follows the known working procedure (and since you have U1MB anyway, enable the PBI HDD and mount the ATR using the SIDE loader built into the Ultimate).
Nevertheless, I cannot finish the procedure with AVG, can I?
I don't see why not on paper, since AVG in SIDE emulation mode is supposed to act exactly like SIDE, and therefore should not present any ROM or registers in the way of U1MB. I tried the other day starting UFLASH.XEX from the AVG loader (not in SIDE mode) and it didn't work, but I attempted this only to answer a query from a forum user. In SIDE2 mode, the AVG loader should not feature in the procedure at all, which should be functionally indistinguishable from updating U1MB firmware using a real SIDE2.
System reset does not unmount FAT-hosted ATRs, if that's what you're worried about. Candle's loader completely unmounted all ATRs every time it was run (the new one does not), but providing you avoid the loader after mounting disk images, they will stay put.
If those Facebook accounts that were causing concerns have disappeared, deleted, been blocked, disable by Facebook, then they are no longer a problem or should be a problem in the future. Does not matter if I had control over them or not.
Looks like a scam artist may be at work.
Absolutely no doubt about it.
Why are we talking about other forum problems here? What's the point? This topic is about the demoscene.
The thread was taken off into the weeds by off-topic posts long before Albert posted anything at all:
Bullshit:
I decided to make the request myself to change my screen name with the admin here.
Fact:
This account name was changed to 'PeteyM5' after admin detected my attempt to sign up with multiple accounts here at atariarea, and I was told I would be banned if I attempted to create more sock-puppet accounts.
Bullshit:
Likewise, I actually had this account here for years, but did not use it much until a few months ago when I saw you were giving other people problems.
Fact:
I started posting in Polish using a sock I had created years ago in order to a) offer the sole voice of support to a troll when I noticed they were giving FJC some stick and I wanted to join in, and b) to make unfounded accusations regarding the 'harassement' and 'bullying' of 'Buffalo Pete' and others.
And so on...
plus I had not attempted to create accounts for almost 3 years now
I understand you kept trying long after that, and I happen to know you still attempt to do the exact same thing when signing up to other forums.
It was obvious I was no longer able to have civil conversations there about my games
Entirely because of your own actions: a pig-headed unwillingness to accept (generally constructive) criticism, implying that the entire community was out to pirate your stuff, and of course maintaining a number of sock-puppet accounts which you used to big-up said products and hold conversations with your main account (so you were actually talking to yourself and creating the impression you were responding to a third party). I think you need to accept a bit of blame for how things panned out at AtariAge, to put it mildly.
There are no special rules from email services about having accounts. How many different email accounts do you have?
I have about four, BUT EVERYONE KNOWS THEY BELONG TO ME. I don't use them to email people creepy, spam messages pretending I'm called 'Jake Arthur'. Of course I receive spam all the time and it goes into the junk, but the big difference here is that I KNOW YOU ARE THE SOURCE OF THE JAKE ARTHUR EMAIL. If any other community member sent me emails like that while pretending to be someone else, and I knew it was them (as I know with 100 per cent certainty that you were behind the Jake Arthur emails), I'd treat them exactly as I treat you: calling you out for your bullshit and publicly questioning why you persist in doing such asinine things.
Everyone I know have multiple email accounts they use for various reasons, separate for work, business, romance, pleasure. I cannot tell you how many times I used a different account to sign up for something because I don't want my business accounts to be spam jammed.
I find it hard to believe anyone can be stupid enough to conflate having separate business and personal email addresses with sending weird, creepy emails to people under an assumed name using a ghost email account. Everything you write is either a massive, deliberate troll, or you're an idiot.
Myself and Video61 receive emails and seems to be ongoing possible coming from thug Atari community members that I had prior problems with on AtariAge.
Not from me you don't. I didn't reply to one of your (again, unsolicited emails) since I was copied in on some discussion between you and another Atari community member, and I seem to remember telling you to f**k off, and have made no attempt to email you since. I ended up blocking Lance's emails, meanwhile, after he started an email disucssion with me about your anitics, because it was like talking to a brick wall. But if you do receive emails from aggravated community members (not the imaginary 'AtariAge thugs', but people like me who you've probably pissed off to the point at which they completely lose their temper), YOU HAVE ONLY YOURSELF TO BLAME.
I have discovered many associations over the years and I know of your association with Albert, the late KJMANN, and others.
LOL. Get a load of Sherlock Holmes here. Of course I speak to Albert privately; I never made any secret of the fact. I was one of the people who helped identify your sock accounts at AtariAge; it wasn't hard, since all your sock accounts made the same grammatical errors you made when posting with your main account. And yes: I spoke to Sal as well. He forwarded me the nasty email you sent him a few days before he died. I still have it sitting here in my inbox.
Having civil discussions online with people does help me build better games.
Hilarious, coming from the person who signed up on this very forum a few months ago and posted under a pseudonym, speaking about 'Buffalo Pete' in the third-person and shit-stirring by accusing me of harrassing him and other community members, until the admin established the account holder's true identity and changed the account name to PeteyM5.
I have taken down those other accounts many months ago because they are no longer necessary.
You forgot this email account. I know time passes quickly as one gets older, but this email was sent only nineteen days ago from the same email account you previously used to register one of several sock-puppet accounts at AtariAge, at the very least (I won't repeat the details of more recent discussions I had with the forum administrators here).
Another one who likes childish games. Birds of a feather flock together, etc.
Avoid getting into keyboard wars that go off topic about the game.
That's great (albeit a bit hard to swallow given the fact you're using an account with which you previously spoke about yourself in the third-person despite the fact everyone suspected it was you using a pseudonym), but if that's genuinely true, do you want to start by not sending me stupid emails (from the same account you previously used to register an account at AtariAge)?
As per: https://forums.atariage.com/topic/11040 ... nt=4194599
xxxxl szczepiles się czy nadal jesteś dziewic ?
Hopefully not. We don't need any more pricks.
Amun-Ra napisał/a:What is that? Some kind of victim blaming?
It seems that way, I'm not sure who's playing the victim. This seems to be about the "Secretum Labyrinth Dark Castle" controversy for the Atari 8-bit. A game similar to Zelda or Adventure where the user explores different screens, collects items and searches for treasures. Posted in 2019 and looks like a music glitch debate as the screen changes. AtariAge forum members attack other games like Prince of Persia. A similar group of people.
I'm not sure why game developers face challenges there. It could be envy or price. The 8-bit Atari lacked something like Zelda, or an extended 2600 Adventure until the retro game makers created something.
It's pretty clear who is 'playing the victim' here. Someone who propagated multiple AtariAge forum accounts and then - after being banned - multiple social media accounts, and has admitted same in as many words (falsely professing to have shut down the accounts on multiple occasions, before proceeding to continue using them). He then plays the victim by claiming that the consequences of his actions were not the result of maintaining sock accounts, shilling, spamming, libel, sending unsolicited and menacing emails and DMs, but some kind of conspiracy to damage his business. Perfectly legitimate constructive criticism (which began politely and in good faith before it became apparent that the protagonist was using the sock 'Bluemoon_001' account to deflect remarks about 'gaps in music' which were only recently acknowledged to have existed all along, and finally - three years later - have been fixed; this was only one of several illegitimate accounts) is - again - framed as 'victimisation', 'bashing', etc. You can see the discussion between two accounts (PeteyM5 and Bluemoon_001) maintained by the same person right here:
https://forums.atariage.com/topic/28529 ... ser-video/
Why anyone would dredge up this three-year old farce (and the legitimate criticisms, which he clearly can't get over to this day) when it's the very thread that resulted in him being booted off the forum after he sailed too close to the wind with the 'Bluemoon_001' account, I don't know; I couldn't have selected a better example which demonstrates every point I am trying to make.
Never mind my 'understanding' and forgiveness toward stupid behaviour: there are 'social consequences' to pig-headedness (deafness to criticism) and deliberate deception (presenting to potential customers mutliple sock-accounts masquerading as independent, unbiased commentators); perhaps if one had not employed such nefarious methods in the first place, and had not continued to do so, it would not be necessary to publicise the matter for the benefit of uninformed community members (as I am inclined to do, having blocked the sock accounts, every time I receive another creepy email from a new burner account).
This is the reason this 'game developer [faced] challenges here', not because of 'envy' (of what?) or 'price'. Not even the nothingburger debates regarding PoP and its use of XBIOS or the game author's theatrical, cape-swinging exit from one of my threads is comparable in any way.
In any case: write more, since the material becomes more interesting with each post. ;)
It seems that the cat is calm and does not worry about what is happening in other places. Let the sleeping cat lie down.
Funny you should say that. Shared at atari8, along with any other such crap I receive:
As the Americans say: Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones. The cat throws a lot, but cannot take what comes back.
I thought for a moment a few posts back that you had started to become reasonable, but clearly you still believe that someone who 'uses mean words' to the attention-seeking idiots previously listed deserves to have his house vandalised (violence, empty-threats and abject cowardice of course being the first refuge of those who cannot provide a cogent argument using words).
... nie wiem jednak jak w przypadku takiego sprzętu wygląda procedura boot z takiego dysku APT i czy istnieje PBI bios dla U1MB który by zadziałał z AVG.
The standard SIDE/SIDE2 U1MB PBI BIOS works with AVG when the cartridge is in SIDE emulation mode.
I did email Lance and got a reply. Stated he was not aware and has no control. Buffalo Pete can just say it's not him. People can fight all they want on forums and social media that live many kilometers apart, and it never ends. This is not the pleasant side of the 8-bit scene.
No, it's not pleasant at all, especially in such a small community. Peter can say it's not him, but unfortunately he's been caught in a lie yet again, since the 'Anne Krys Stark' account (previously named 'Katzpinke Colleen', 'Marie Rousso', 'Mary Rose Bartkowicz', and 'Meri Barinov') was one of the moderators of his facebook group when this screenshot was taken:
His attempts to explain this away just result in further convolution:
Regarding Rensoup: I can only assume Peter is referring to some debate regarding Prince of Persia, which fizzled out no later than March 2022. PoP is in fact freely downloadable, and Rensoup's latest (and quite reasonable) complaint is that someone appeared to be selling or was planning to sell pre-flashed cartridges with copies of his software on them.
As for Lance Ringquist: that's the usual response he issues, but he in fact shares Peter's opinion of AtariAge and repeatedly defends Peter's behaviour.
Here's another example of Peter admitting to being in control the account while simultaneously denying it:
Whoever controls this Anne Krys account is teasing flashjazzcat. Buffalo Pete doesn't mention what's going on here, in his Facebook group, or Atari.IO. Can we be sure it's him?
Peter has apparently addressed the situation in a post made on his... um... 'primary' account, in which he denies all knowledge of the Anne Krys Stark account, despite the fact it's the same account which was once an admin on his group page, albeit under a different name (easily demonstrable by screenshots taken at the time). He appears to be hopelessly confused at the moment, which is what happens, I suppose.
Why was Rensoup's name introduced into this thread, BTW, and why is he continually mentioned? AFAIK, he is a good faith actor with whom I have had no interaction since March 2022. If he's discouraged from writing porting games, I would imagine it's because of this: https://forums.atariage.com/topic/29891 ... nt=5154969
atari.area forum » Posty przez flashjazzcat
Wygenerowano w 0.022 sekund, wykonano 44 zapytań